Guidance Forums / Reginald Rexx / Sort question

Search 搜索
Home Home

Forum List • Thread List • Reply • Refresh • New Topic • Search • Previous • Next First 1 Last
Message1. Sort question
Posted by: Michael S 2007-09-22 09:55:27 Last edited by: Michael S 2007-09-22 10:16:34 (Total edited 1 time)
Given the following example

temp.0 = 9
temp.1 = 'hello 2007/03/12-10:01'
temp.2 = 'hellohello 2007/03/12-10:00'
temp.3 = 'adam 2007/04/12-10:00'
temp.4 = 'eve 2007/03/12-10:00'
temp.5 = 'stockholm 2007/03/12-10:00'
temp.6 = 'london 2007/05/28-10:00'
temp.7 = 'me 2007/03/12-10:00'
temp.8 = 'yes 2007/03/12-10:00'
temp.9 = 'no 2007/03/12-10:00'

SORT temp. .  a +4 b +6 c +9

DO i = 1 TO temp.0
	SAY 'temp.'i' = 'temp.i

what I'm trying to do is to sort the stem based on the (in this example) year, month and day in ascending order. By specifing the dot after temp. I imagined that the lengths would be taken from the beginning of the next word, but that doesn't seem to be working (unless I'm doing it wrong).
Is there a way of doing the above without aligning the columns so that all the dates are "under" each other ?

(I also tried sort temp. . A which works fine in this scenario. The reason I include the positional parms is when the dates are a different format, English for example. The example above is Swedish date formatting which means that the simple sort temp. . A works okay)
Posted by: DougA 2007-10-01 23:43:16
There does appear to be some confusion as to how the +nn value works when it's used as in your example.  Jeff would have to explain.

However, how about using this instead:

SORT temp. .  a '/' b '/' c '-'
Message3. I don't think that will work
Posted by: Michael S 2007-10-02 15:23:41
Remember, I'm trying to sort based on years, months and days. Where these items are in the date string depends on the XP language you have. I would have (?) have variations like

SORT temp. c '/' b '/' a '-'

for the language that has its date as 28/03/2003, but

SORT temp. a '/' c '/' b '-'

for the language that has its date as 2003/28/03 (not sure if the examples are correct, but you get my drift)
Posted by: DougA 2007-10-03 21:54:36
Doesn't your original example, using offsets, have the same issue ?

If the issue is the XP setting,  how about converting the date into a non-position form ?  Say  basedate, then sort that ?
Message5. That's the whole point
Posted by: Michael S 2007-10-04 01:08:54 Last edited by: Michael S 2007-10-04 01:18:00 (Total edited 1 time)
I calculate/generate the offsets based on an attempted interpretation of the date received. In the other append (?) I showed that if you use hard-coded values for the offsets, the sort worked, but not when the offsets were variables.

I tried your example as in

temp.0 = 9
temp.1 = 'hello      09/03/2007-10:00'
temp.2 = 'hellohello 12/03/2007-11:00'
temp.3 = 'adam       12/04/2007-12:00'
temp.4 = 'eve        12/03/2007-10:00'
temp.5 = 'stockholm  12/03/2005-10:23'
temp.6 = 'london     28/05/2007-12:32'
temp.7 = 'me         12/03/2007-12:12'
temp.8 = 'yes        12/03/2007-12:12'
temp.9 = 'no         12/03/2007-12:12'

SORT temp. .  c '/'  b '/' a '-' .

DO i = 1 TO temp.0
    SAY 'temp.'i' = 'temp.i

but as you can see, unless you can see hat I'm doing something wrong, it doesn't seem to be working with this variation either.
Posted by: DougA 2007-10-04 01:46:20 Last edited by: DougA 2007-10-04 01:48:33 (Total edited 1 time)
I don't think offsets can be placed into variables  (someone correct me if that's wrong )

Since you have to calculate/generate offsets, you have the logic to determine which order it's in, can't you then do something like:
  when {somelogic} then sort temp. .  a '/'  b '/' c '-' .
  when {somelogic} then sort temp. .  c '/'  b '/' a '-' .
  else                               sort temp. .  b '/'  c '/' a '-' .

At least the logic would be clearer I'd think.

(edit ... I guess you could use this same approach with hard coded offsets too)

As to the example, here are my results:

temp.1 = stockholm  12/03/2005-10:23
temp.2 = me         12/03/2007-12:12
temp.3 = no         12/03/2007-12:12
temp.4 = eve        12/03/2007-10:00
temp.5 = yes        12/03/2007-12:12
temp.6 = hello      09/03/2007-10:00
temp.7 = hellohello 12/03/2007-11:00
temp.8 = adam       12/04/2007-12:00
temp.9 = london     28/05/2007-12:32

It looks ok, except for the 'c' sort (item 6) ... this looks like a bug in the sort
Forum List • Thread List • Reply • Refresh • New Topic • Search • Previous • Next First 1 Last
© Wed 2024-2-21  Guidance Laboratory Inc. Hits:0