Guidance Forums / Rapid-Q Basic / Dummy Journey to Write a Compiler Using RapidQ-Guidance指路人

Guidance
指路人
g.yi.org

Guidance Forums / Rapid-Q Basic / Dummy Journey to Write a Compiler Using RapidQ

Home

Software

Upload

回顶部

⇑

Forum List • Thread List • Refresh • New Topic • Search • Previous • Next

1. Dummy Journey to Write a Compiler Using RapidQ

#935

Posted by: 2003-05-18 07:05:27

Dear RapidQ friends,

To moderator: if you found this notes is useful, please make it
available as text file for download

We have seen a few attempts before to cloning the RapidQ compiler
but it was frozen and nothing has progress until now. The reason
is so little of RapidQ programmer can participate since not all
knowing C/C++ or Assembly language that become the source code of
the new clone compiler. With this limitations, less people would
be able to join and make improvement into the project.

If we do it on the language where most of us know, Which is BASIC
language of RapidQ, I believe we can progress more. For Example,
some of RapidQ regulars has done so much on contributions of UDT
(user defined Types) and has added features into RapidQ with some
of INCLUDE files that available for downloads now.

Some people says we can't a compiler using RapidQ. But I believe
otherwise. Since the RapidQ has features of reading and writing binary
filestream, I guess, this would be a hidden feature we never use fully.
With a Hex editor/utility, Intel instruction sets and PE format
Documentations which is available in the internet, I think we able to
create something like small new compiler or layer include for the
RapidQ itself. And it is look delicous, but it will take time with
a lots of testing and sharing the source among us.

Based on what I'm mentioned above in subject of binary filestream,
once we know what is the requirement of PE format and machine
instructions, we could make another 'INCLUDES' to have layer (off
cause using UDT and QFileStream function) of a compiler that
produced small footprint of executable format in a new RapidQ IDE.
With RapidQ source code, it mean will be more access by other RapidQ
programmers (novice or experts) and done some testing to produce
small binary results for a start. May be, we begin with a "Hello
World" dialog compiler.

I've seen in Nasmw, a small sample of code to produce 'Hello" dialog
executable window. Since not all of us know ASM well including me,
don't look at the Nasm source code, but take the "hello " EXE binary
and we examine under a Hex Editor. We break it into a few block and
isolate which are the PE header, format, data and so on. The EXE just
about 616 Bytes, but it will take use a long, long time to analyse it.
And it worth it eventhough we will not has succeed on it. Because,
if it succeed, we will be able to make an UDT routine to write PE
format using QFileStream Binary read/write function and another UDT
that translate the basic syntax to HEX code. Have you ever heard a
phrase 'when I type 101011, your live will changed'?

Okay, maybe some of you did not understand what I'm talking about the
above idea. Here some simple explanation about the "Hello" executable
example produced by Nasmw above based from it's source code:

[qoute]
1. The Hello dialog executable contain PE Header format which is
    understandable by the OS and the machine. By that, the file
    can be execute under the OS (for eg. Windows OS).

2. Also in the file also has Window API call to User32.dll that
    is requesting for the file to borrow the dailog window named
    MessageBoxA to be drawn into the desktop screen. The borrowing
    task feeding a string "Hello World!" to be drawn in the dialog
    box/window.
[/qoute]

Below is the Hello World source code in NASMW:


 -----------------------------------------------------------
 ; TO assemble , just RUN " masw hello.asm -o hello.exe " !
 ; there's no need for a linker
 IMAGEBASE equ 0x400000
 SECTIONALIGN equ 4096
 FILEALIGN equ 512
 SECTION_RVA equ 4096
 a equ 0x400e00
 dw 'MZ'
 times 29 dw 0
 dd 0x40
 db 'PE',0,0
 dw 0x14c
 dw 1
 dd 0,0,0
 dw 0xe0
 dw 0x102
 dw 0x10b
 dw 0
 dd 0,0,0
 dd Main-SECTION_START+SECTION_RVA
 dd 0,0
 dd IMAGEBASE
 dd SECTIONALIGN
 dd FILEALIGN
 dw 0,0,0,0
 dw 4
 dw 0
 dd 0
 dd SECTION_END-SECTION_START
 dd SECTION_START
 dd 0
 dw 2
 dw 0
 dd 0x1000
 dd 0x1000
 dd 0,0,0
 dd 0x10
 dd 0,0
 dd SECTION_RVA
 dd IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_END-SECTION_START
 times 28 dd 0
 db 'Flat_exe'
 dd 0
 dd SECTION_RVA
 dd SECTION_END-SECTION_START
 dd SECTION_START
 dd 0,0
 dw 0,0
 db 0x60,0,0,0xe0
 align FILEALIGN,db 0
 [BITS 32]
 SECTION_START
 dd FIRST_THUNK-SECTION_START+SECTION_RVA
 dd 0
 dd -1
 dd DLLNAME-SECTION_START+SECTION_RVA
 dd FIRST_THUNK-SECTION_START+SECTION_RVA
 times 5 dd 0
 DLLNAME db 'user32.dll',0
 FIRST_THUNK
 MsgBox
 dd IMPORT_BY_NAME-SECTION_START+SECTION_RVA
 dd 0
 IMPORT_BY_NAME
 dw 0
 db 'MessageBoxA',0
 IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_END

 STRING db 'Hello World!',0

 Main
 XOR edx,edx
 mov eax,STRING+a
 push edx
 push eax
 push eax
 push edx
 CALL DWORD [MsgBox+a]
 ret

 SECTION_END
 ------------------------------------------------------------

I've modified a bit from original source code to see what
was happening and is works anyway and produce 616 Bytes.
But here I'm not stressing about Assembly language here,
but how we could use Hex editor and break apart the block
of sections and what data need to be change when we produce
different output such as adding icon resource into the
executable file.

Look here the file in Bytes(Hex) of the hello.exe above:


 -Offset------------------ Hex Bytes ----------------------
 4d 5a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00
 50 45 00 00 4c 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 e0 00 02 01 0b 01 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 56 10 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 10 00 00 00 02 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 68 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00
 000000A0   00 10 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000000B0   00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000000C0   00 10 00 00 49 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000000D0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000000F0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 46 6c 61 74 5f 65 78 65
 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 68 00 00 00 00 02 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 60 00 00 e0
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000001A0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000001B0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000001C0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000001D0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 000001F0   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 33 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 28 10 00 00
 33 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 75 73 65 72 33 32 2e 64
 6c 6c 00 3b 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4d 65 73
 73 61 67 65 42 6f 78 41 00 48 65 6c 6c 6f 20 57
 6f 72 6c 64 21 00 31 d2 b8 49 10 40 00 52 50 50
 52 ff 15 33 10 40 00 c3
 ----------------------------------------------------------

Funny though, if you copy above hex bytes row-by-row excluding
the offset, into a Hex editor and save it as hello.exe, you
will get the program working w/o have to get nasmw and do the
above asm coding. lol! This is ordinary people looking at
complicated things...

Now enough joking, look at the offset number and total
twin numbers at hex bytes row. it's looks like this:

0123456789ABCDEF and each hex bytes row has 16 columns each.

Are you noticed that? Maybe Assembly programmers understood
that easily. But for us ordinary people say 'oh! Thats how
machine counting number!' If human count 1 to 10, machine
count 0 to F and it's got 16 digits.

Let examine the structures on hello.exe binary file base on
the above data. Using an PE viewer, I could summarized the
way that we familiar as the following (note: this is not a
source code but the method I describe things similar to
basic language. But I guess, some smart people here could
makes source code from those. Remember William Yu source code
for ZIP file viewer?):


 Stucture of Hello.exe
 Header
 Import
 END Structure

Lets breakdown the Header Structure


 Structure Header
 Exe
 Coff
 Optional
 Section
 END Structure

Lets break on details of the above Headers:


   'Reference:
   '-- Elements -------Hex Value--Offsets---Type ?---RQHex

 TYPE Exe
  .Signature: MZ    5A4D     00000000  AS SHORT &H4D54
  .Extra Bytes      0000     00000002  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Pages            0000     00000004  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Reloc Items      0000     00000006  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Header Size      0000     00000008  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Min Alloc        0000     0000000A  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Max Alloc        0000     0000000C  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Initial SS       0000     0000000E  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Initial SP       0000     00000010  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Check Sum        0000     00000012  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Initial IP       0000     00000014  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Initial CS       0000     00000016  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Reloc Table      0000     00000018  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Overlay          0000     0000001A  AS SHORT &H0000
 END TYPE

 TYPE Coff
  .Signature: PE    00004550 00000040  AS LONG  &H50450000
  .Machine: i386    014C     00000044  AS SHORT &H4C01
  .Num of Sections  0001     00000046  AS SHORT &H0100
  .Time/Date Stamp  00000000 00000048  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Symbol Table PTR 00000000 0000004C  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Num of Symbols   00000000 00000050  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Opt Header Size  00E0     00000054  AS SHORT &HE000
  .Characteristics  0102     00000056  AS SHORT &H0201
 END TYPE

 TYPE Optional
      'Notes: magic code 010B=Normal Executable, 0107=ROM Image
  .Magic            010B     00000058  AS SHORT &H0B01
  .Linker Major Ver 00       0000005A  AS BYTE  &H00
  .Linker Minor Ver 00       0000005B  AS BYTE  &H00
  .Code Sect Size   00000000 0000005C  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Init DATA Size   00000000 00000060  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .UnInit DATA Size 00000000 00000064  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Entry Point RVA  00001056 00000068  AS LONG  &H56100000
  .Base of Code     00000000 0000006C  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Base of DATA     00000000 00000070  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Image Base       00400000 00000074  AS LONG  &H00004000
  .Sect. Alignment  00001000 00000078  AS LONG  &H00100000
  .File Alignment   00000200 0000007C  AS LONG  &H00020000
  .OS Major Version 0000     00000080  AS SHORT &H0000
  .OS Minor Version 0000     00000084  AS SHORT &H0000
  .User Major Ver.  0000     00000086  AS SHORT &H0000
  .User Minor Ver.  0000     00000088  AS SHORT &H0000
  .SubSys Major Ver 0004     0000008A  AS SHORT &H0400
  .SubSys Minor Ver 0000     0000008A  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Reserved         00000000 0000008C  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Image Size       00000068 00000090  AS LONG  &H68000000
  .Header Size      00000200 00000094  AS LONG  &H00020000
  .File Checksum    00000000 00000098  AS LONG  &H00000000
      'Notes: SubSystem codes 1=Native,      2=windows GUI,
      '                       3=Windows CUI, 4=POSIX CUI
  .SubSystem        0002     0000009C  AS SHORT &H0200
  .DLL Flags        0000     0000009E  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Stack Reverse Sz 00001000 000000A0  AS LONG  &H00100000
  .Stack Commit Sz  00001000 000000A4  AS LONG  &H00100000
  .Heap Reverse Sz  00000000 000000A8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Heap Commit Size 00000000 000000AC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Loader Flags     00000000 000000B0  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .DATA Dir Num     00000010 000000B4  AS LONG  &H10000000
  .Export Tbl Addr. 00000000 000000B8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Export& Size     00000000 000000BC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Import Tbl Addr. 00001000 000000C0  AS LONG  &H00100000
  .Import&    Size  00000049 000000C4  AS LONG  &H49000000
  .Res. Table Addr. 00000000 000000C8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Resource& Size   00000000 000000CC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Except. Tbl Size 00000000 000000D0  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Exception& Size  00000000 000000D4  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Secur. Tbl Addr. 00000000 000000D8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Security& Size   00000000 000000DC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Base Reloc TAddr 00000000 000000E0  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Base Reloc& Size 00000000 000000E4  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Debug DATA Addr. 00000000 000000E8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Dbg DATA Size    00000000 000000EC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .CR DATA Address  00000000 000000F0  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Copyright Size   00000000 000000F4  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .GLOBAL PTR       00000000 000000F8  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .GLOBAL PTR& Size 00000000 000000FC  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .TLS Table Addr.  00000000 00000100  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .TLS& Size        00000000 00000104  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .LoadCfg Tbl Addr 00000000 00000108  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .LoadCfg& Size    00000000 0000010C  AS LONG  &H00000000
 END TYPE

 TYPE Section[Array]
  .Component[0] AS Flat_exe (should be .rdata)
 END TYPE

   'Noted: Flat_exe just a name I put there as one of the type
   '       in the section. It might be defined differ. Check out
   '       PE format documentation (it should be one of these
   '       .text,.rdata,.data,.idata,const,.rsrc or code).
   '        Actually, this is not valid EXE, but it works anyway.

 TYPE Flat_exe  (.rdata)
  .Section Name     Flat_exe 00000138  AS STRING*8
  .Virtual Size     00000000 00000140  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .RVA/Offset       00001000 00000144  AS LONG  &H00100000
  .Size of Raw DATA 00000068 00000148  AS LONG  &H68000000
  .PTR TO Raw DATA  00000200 0000014C  AS LONG  &H00020000
  .PTR TO Relocs    00000000 00000150  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .PTR TO LineNo    00000000 00000154  AS LONG  &H00000000
  .Number of Relocs 0000     00000158  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Number of LineNo 0000     0000015A  AS SHORT &H0000
  .Section Flag     E0000060 0000015C  AS LONG  &H600000E0
      '(Writeable,Readable,Executable,Initialized Data,Code)
 END TYPE

It's quite long informations to be digested isn't. What we can see
from the above structures and types, we could write an includes
file that write PE header to produce executable file. But, it's
not done yet. How about those import data and if any resources
added into the code? From PE viewer, I can't see the address
and how long it takes for import data integers.

We have yet done. From the data breakdown above, we stop at
offset 0000015C in section flag of .code type that talk to OS is
this type is executable section (It's just my impression. I don't
know what actually it is anyway). At least, I'm understand it's
look that way. Perhaps, assembler programmer could tell better.
In human numbering, we stop at row 23 column 12 from the hex bytes
table above plus a LONG bytes (+4 columns) and it stop exactly
at 00000160 or row 24. So, begin from there, the import section
is begin until the end. But, it too general isn't it?

Using Hex Editor, from row 24(offset 160) until row 33(offset 1F0),
there is no value. But it might change on different executable. For
now, just forget about it. we begin from row 34(offset 200). I've
made a wild guess based on Type Flat_exe.Ptr_to_Raw_Data above we
should read at offset 200. I can't figure out yet what is structure
references from offset 200 to 227. The only translation i can do now
is the following:


 ---Elements----------Value--------Offsets---TYPE ?------
 .Imported DLL file   User32.dll   00000228  AS STRING*10
 .DLL FUNCTION Name   MessageBoxA  0000023D  AS STRING*11
 .QLABEL              Hello World! 00000249  AS STRING*12

Conclusions:
This is the study that I've made so far to make a new compiler using
RapidQ itself. My objective is very simple, if I could make a small
message box compiler using rapidQ based from the above UDT's and
produce an executable file. I hope with this informations, someone
else would able too make an attempt to create small compiler using
RapidQ based on Binary file study.

I've to study different types of similar messagebox executable file as
comparation on PE header structures. For instance, Iczelion's tutorial
2 compiled using MASM32. Since that file size is bigger about 2KB, I
believe there is a new things I'll found inside the binary such as
additional call to Kernel.dll and more valid and organized PE file
structures.

Lets look at this way, we make UDTs to write executable file similar
to read PCX or GIF files using UDT and then transfer to QBitmap. I
believe this can be done because I've successfully make an Truvision
TGA file with alpha channel viewer and save it to transparent GIF
without using DLL call such as NViewLib.dll (I will talk about this
some other time or I will upload the source code once I managed to
optimized the file reading speed and after completed the project).

So, the method is the same when writing to binary file and this time we
produce an EXE file. Some of the above values might change here and
there along the UDTs. With more studies, we would understand more about
those value and their options so we could produce mini compiler for
a start.

Happy coding...

2. Machine code

#939

Posted by: guidance 2003-05-18 10:39:32

Since the high efficiency of this forum script, seems no necessary to make your post as a separate text file?

I have to say, the data/graphic file analysis is quite different with exe file. Right, the PE file format is obtainable and clear, but besides the PE header, the main question is, how to translate RQ source to machine code, i.e. compile, to actual executable instruction code? Say, RQ source

messagebox "hello world!"

to machine code, for example, maybe:

00000220   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 75 73 65 72 33 32 2e 64
00000230   6c 6c 00 3b 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4d 65 73
00000240   73 61 67 65 42 6f 78 41 00 48 65 6c 6c 6f 20 57
00000250   6f 72 6c 64 21 00 31 d2 b8 49 10 40 00 52 50 50
00000260   52 ff 15 33 10 40 00 c3

One idea is to use an existing compiler, like BCX does. Or, use assembler --- that way, we must create many many low level libraries, like string, math, array, UDT, etc. etc., besides GUI framework, all in ASM or binary compatible format (that's what doctor electron planning).

3. Re: Machine code

#941

Posted by: 2003-05-18 15:27:18

Guidance, if we look at coding keyword-by-keyword, it will be
a lot harder as you said. when I wrote TGA data reader, it's
quite a challenges. I've to read binary pointer from top of
the file & then from the bottom off the file. This exercise
has teach me some valuable experiences in working binary as
I've never before do such a things.

To translate RQ code such as messagebox "hello world!", we just
can't to associate the machine code from offset 220 to 260. If
we do this way, it's comeback to square one to producing mass
duplicates machine code that lead to bigger executable footprint.

Try visual this way, when we readline QMessageBox() + String$
+ strlength%, we add value to UDT Optional and UDT Section
as in the above notes. Value(integer) such as size, position or
location in numerics value which is we could understand then
Qfilestream.writenum() will convert to Hex bytes. Once,
it done, we add Win32Api DLL name and it function into offset 220
to 260. This machine will expand it size if we call other DLL.
So, this machince code is not just for MessageBox only but as
import 'Module' or table that contains many records. Apart from
that, their other value in the machine code that could tell which
is call by who and how. This is need to translated further.

When Keyword MessageBox has been used, we use UDT that will
specify what DLL and which functions need for it. To do this, we
need Win32Api references. If DLL already call by other functions,
we just add borrowed function need to be used. Again, if already
called/defined, just pointing the execution with parameters.
With Win32Api, we no longer using Delphi object as used in current
RQ such as TForm and so on. Using many many includes files thats
has several UDTs are normals. Even BCX has to rely on several of
LCC-Win32 Includes and Library files. MASM32 also has the same
with added macros and so on. Once we have working compiler, the
decision can be made to built them into the compiler or separate
includes file outside the compiler. But separate includes/UDT files
will be an advantages, where improvement can be made by users or
other programmers. Because programming is subjective and some
people preferred different needs than others. Needs will change
thru times.

Compiled RQ executable file contains a lots of things that not
need by the program result. But thats was William Yu decision
not to optimized the code. Single programmer will take ages to
do just about optimizing back on the time. Nowaday, with advance
HLA language has been use in Assembler, similar optimization
techniques and exercises could be followed.

BCX is good, but rely on Lcc. It is hard to leave RQ. Once the
binary PE translated, BCX should be the good source code examples.
We should have BAX, Basic to ASM translator to get even. Let the
things happened thru time. Sure there are smart guys capable to
make first step. About Dr. Electron project, I've full support
on it. It should be done and some coder has ASM skill should
gather and working on the project. On the other hand, what I'm
visionized in this thread is a possibility making compiler in RQ
Basic language itself. I agree that it hasn't been done before
without translating into C/C++ or ASM. But my idea is using direct
Binary writing as an escape path for BASIC limitation. What is
most important in my idea is keywords and values are understandable
in plain english by the common BASIC programmers.

Anyway, thanks to you Guidance. By try to answer you question, I get
the solution at the same time. Still, this is just a theory. I should
continue the experiments to pursue this objective. If anybody got
any interesting questions, please write in. It may lead to some
solutions just by asking...

Happy coding....

4. Language

#945

Posted by: guidance 2003-05-18 18:23:16

Which language to write a Basic to C or to ASM translator is not the key problem here, I also prefer RQ itself. But since RQ code is going to be translated to C or ASM, the translator writer must master both RQ and the target language, C or ASM, thus, C/C++ is also a good candidate. ASM is not proposed in my opinion anyhow.

5. Re: Language

#950

Posted by: 2003-05-20 01:28:09

This is why making compiler is very tricky. Nevertheless, the idea seed in RapidQ by William Yu; learning programming through examples is driving people to make a new BASIC compiler. He made one using Delphi like Objects. When someone make new RQ compiler using ASM for instance, he/she has to decide wether to keep these OOP intact or just completely migrate to Win32API resource like BCX.

If you're C oriented person, might be able to use a free template called The compiler compiler or compiler creator if I'm not wrong. I'm not pretty much sure about the exact name of the package and it's available for download from programmer resources download site. May be you could give it try.

Nobody can master to each programming language completely. But if they working in group, one always completing each other. Then most of needed things covered by their works. What is the important things is the leader that organized the group. The master mind must not weak to keep project going...

Forum List • Thread List • Refresh • New Topic • Search • Previous • Next

掌柜推荐

¥1,290.00 ·

¥918.00 ·

¥890.00 ·

¥294.00 ·

¥430.00 ·

¥1,380.00 ·

g.yi.org Hits:0